{"id":546,"date":"2016-08-16T11:00:14","date_gmt":"2016-08-16T15:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/?p=546"},"modified":"2017-03-03T13:12:30","modified_gmt":"2017-03-03T18:12:30","slug":"feedbag-5-to-trouble","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/2016\/08\/16\/feedbag-5-to-trouble\/","title":{"rendered":"Feedbag #5: TO Trouble"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"image.aspx_1_cropped\"Hello and welcome to the fifth installment of the Feedbag! Last time<\/a>, we covered how to have a conversation with someone who has provided feedback you disagree with.<\/p>\n

Our question for this month comes to us from \u201cPO\u2019d by TO\u201d:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I’d like to write a tournament report, but my experience with the TO was largely negative. The event was poorly planned and managed. What should I do?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

To begin with, I\u2019ll focus on the tournament report aspect. If the tournament organizer creates negative event experiences for judges and\/or players, you\u2019ll probably want to consider actions ranging from providing that feedback to the TO to declining to work for them in the future. More on this toward the end.<\/p>\n

You should still write this tournament report. The fact that the event wasn\u2019t run well from the TO side will probably create a very interesting report! However, the trick is writing it in such a way that you don\u2019t look like you\u2019re blasting the TO in public.<\/p>\n

You might have heard the expression \u201cpraise in public, criticize in private\u201d before, and it\u2019s generally good advice to follow. Although the nature of a tournament report makes it public, there are still steps to take to be professional and also describe how this event went off the rails. Keep in mind that the event is all in the past now. It doesn\u2019t matter who this TO is. It doesn\u2019t matter whether the the TO had a bad day or they were replaced by their evil goateed twin. All that matters to you is sharing your experience for the benefit of others.<\/p>\n

I see tournament reports as having two audiences:<\/p>\n

1. Judges who can read your report and learn from your experiences.
\n2. The judge who will administer your L2 test or advocate for your L2 candidacy (if this report is written as part of the L2 advancement process).<\/p>\n

You can still provide value to both these audiences even if the TO did a suboptimal job on their own event. Keep these people in mind and decide what parts of your experience are useful to them. Did you step up and get the event back on track despite the TO\u2019s best (or worst) efforts? That\u2019s great! Tell us how you did that! Did you realize things were going downhill, but fail to confront the TO about it? That\u2019s okay, too — you\u2019ve probably learned from that, and now your audience can, too.<\/p>\n

Your tournament report should still have a lot of value despite, or maybe even because of, the TO\u2019s behavior. You can still share that with us, just remember to be clinical — the lessons are what matter here, not the individual.<\/p>\n

Okay, so now you\u2019ve written a super-amazing tournament report that lets other judges benefit from your struggles. You\u2019ve still got a TO on your hands who has produced a less-than-fully enjoyable event experience. Many of us get involved in judging because we\u2019re invested in creating good player experiences, and part of that investment can be helping TOs improve from event to event so that players have a better time at the next one. A third potential audience for your tournament report is the TO! Sharing your report could be a way of clarifying the reasons the TO\u2019s event faced challenges and ways to improve future event management.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re interested in helping your TO improve, analyze the issues that occurred. How did you solve them? Why did they happen? Did the TO not know any better, going with a plan that was destined to fail? Did the TO ignore your input and insist on on something that didn\u2019t make sense?<\/p>\n

The TO is hiring you not only to answer rules questions and solve in-game problems but also to be their event expert. You\u2019ve got credibility and leverage as a result. In my experience, many TOs will defer to you if you push back against a questionable decision because they trust you to handle their event completely. If the conversation isn\u2019t that easy, treat them as you would another judge: provide critical feedback. Highlight what went wrong, why it impacts the event, and what the TO can do to correct this next time.<\/p>\n

Thanks to \u201cPO\u2019d by TO\u201d for this month\u2019s question!<\/p>\n

If you\u2019d like to submit a question to the Feedbag, either using your own name or by combining a pronoun and a color, please contact me<\/a> via JudgeApps.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Hello and welcome to the fifth installment of the Feedbag! Last time, we covered how to have a conversation with someone who has provided feedback you disagree with. Our question for this month comes to us from \u201cPO\u2019d by TO\u201d:   I’d like to write a tournament report, but my experience with the TO was […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":275,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[32,12,25,69],"tags":[23,13,14,70],"language":[78],"class_list":["post-546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-feedbag","category-joe-wiesenberg","category-strategy","category-tournament-organizers","tag-edited-by-angela-aliff","tag-feedbag","tag-joe-wiesenberg","tag-tournament-organizers","language-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/275"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=546"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":551,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546\/revisions\/551"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=546"},{"taxonomy":"language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/language?post=546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}