{"id":685,"date":"2016-11-15T11:00:36","date_gmt":"2016-11-15T16:00:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/?p=685"},"modified":"2017-03-03T13:11:51","modified_gmt":"2017-03-03T18:11:51","slug":"taking-selfies-part-four","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/2016\/11\/15\/taking-selfies-part-four\/","title":{"rendered":"Taking Selfies &#8211; Part Four"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-268 alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/files\/2016\/04\/Riki.jpg\" alt=\"Riki\" width=\"178\" height=\"204\" \/>Welcome back to the thrilling conclusion of the self evaluation series. If you\u2019re just joining me, be sure to go back to Parts <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/2016\/08\/09\/taking-selfies-part-one\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">One<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/2016\/09\/13\/taking-selfies-part-two\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Two<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, and <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/2016\/10\/11\/taking-selfies-part-three\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Three<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. This week, as the second half of my advice on how to write your Level 3 Self Review, I\u2019ll be covering the final five <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/o\/judge-testing\/level-3-advancement-process\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Qualities of a Premier Judge<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>TEAMWORK, DIPLOMACY, AND MATURITY<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Grouped Qualities like this can be difficult to write about because they encompass related, yet different, aspects of you. In fact, this Quality used to be two separate ones with Maturity being paired with Attitude. My advice on these multi-pronged Qualities is to write about a paragraph or two about each sub-quality. If there\u2019s some overlap, you can use that to segue between paragraphs. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">For this section of the Self Review, I suggest thinking about <\/span><b>Teamwork<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> as how you work with other judges on events and projects. <\/span><b>Diplomacy<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, on the other hand, is how you interact with the community, perhaps through social media or more official channels like <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/apps.magicjudges.org\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">JudgeApps<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. Diplomacy also covers your interactions with players and TOs, both at events and outside them. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Maturity<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> is probably the most nebulous in this Quality. The difficulty in writing about maturity, as well as the rest of this Quality, has to do with examples. It\u2019s easy to come up with examples of failed teamwork, diplomacy, or maturity. But in the absence of failure, it can be hard to articulate why you\u2019re good or even great in this category. \u201cI\u2019m mature because I don\u2019t have issues with anyone\u201d isn\u2019t a useful statement.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Exploring your own maturity can be difficult. We all want to think of ourselves as adult human beings. After some soul-searching of my own, I\u2019ve decided that I need to be more outgoing and friendly at events. It\u2019s not good enough that \u201cquiet and mysterious are just the way I am.\u201d For me to be a better judge, it\u2019s important that other judges feel comfortable talking to me. Admitting this and forging a way forward have been an important step in my own search for maturity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Snap Tip:<\/b> <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rather than try to find an overarching theme, write about Teamwork, Diplomacy, and Maturity as distinct subsections.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><b>STRESS AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Magic tournaments are pretty stressful. You\u2019re lying if you tell your panel that you\u2019ve never felt the stress. This Quality asks how you actively manage that stress. It\u2019s not enough to say, \u201cI was at GP Vegas. That even was really stressful, and I survived.\u201d You need to demonstrate that you can pinpoint the underlying causes of stress and respond with appropriate strategies for overcoming it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Another difficulty in writing about <\/span><b>Stress and Conflict Management<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> is that you have to have experienced conflict. If you\u2019ve come all this way in the judge program without conflict, this section of your Self Evaluation will be insufficient. I\u2019ve seen my fair share of judges who might look adequate at conflict management, when in reality they <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">avoid<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> conflict. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Snap Tip:<\/b> <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Stress and conflict management is active, not passive. Identify specific actions you\u2019ve taken to manage stress and resolve conflict. <\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><b>TOURNAMENT OPERATIONS AND LOGISTICS<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This might seem like yet another multi-pronged Quality, but these two words are actually synonyms. The Judge Program just likes to throw around the word <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Logistics<\/span><\/i> <span style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=VCh6HnXHKRc\" target=\"_blank\">like we\u2019re the UPS<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">With this Quality, my mantra that \u201cexistence does not equal experience\u201d holds the most true. Writing that you\u2019ve attended twenty GPs doesn\u2019t provide any details about your strengths in <\/span><b>Tournament Operations<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. To write this section successfully, you should describe more specific experiences in different roles and teams. Your examples will be particularly useful if you\u2019ve managed especially challenging and complex roles like being Team Lead of Product Logistics at a Limited event or Side Events Lead at a Grand Prix.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It\u2019s also important to cite evidence of success and excellence in those roles. Can you quote other people who witnessed said success? Do it! Reviews and Exemplars often make ideal support\u00a0here. Heck, this type of evidence is great for any Quality! But it\u2019s probably most relevant here since judging is fundamentally about events.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Snap Tip:<\/b> <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cite specific roles you\u2019ve filled and evidence of corresponding successes from reviews and Exemplar nominations.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><b>PROGRAM CONSTRUCTION AND PHILOSOPHY<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In theory, this Quality should be easy to write about. The official <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/o\/judge-testing\/level-3-advancement-process\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Level 3 Advancement Process<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> states, \u201cLevel 3 Judges can describe the roles of Level 1, 2, and 3 judges and the qualities that make good judges at those levels.\u201d So go and read those roles and qualities. Done. For a written Self Review, you could just regurgitate the facts on <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/o\/judge-levels\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">this page<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. Heck, if you\u2019re lazy you could just copy\/paste from it and use a thesaurus. <em><strong>(<\/strong><\/em><\/span><b><i>Don\u2019t do this!) <\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In actuality, <\/span><b>Program Construction and Philosophy<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> is more difficult to write about than it appears. Many people don\u2019t dig much deeper into this Quality than just memorizing the blurb about what L1s, 2s, and 3s do. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">But philosophy is about the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">why<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. What are the reasons behind <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/o\/judge-levels\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">these level distinctions<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">? Why has the program undergone various level redefinitions? Why did Levels 4 and 5 go away? The ability to think critically about these changes is important. It\u2019s ok to disagree with changes, but you must be able to explain your disagreement.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Snap Tip:<\/b> <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Go over what you\u2019ve written, and delete every statement that has to do solely with facts. Instead, make sure that you are writing about underlying philosophy. Imagine that your audience keeps asking \u201cwhy?\u201d, and write your answers. <\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><b>LEADERSHIP, PRESENCE, AND CHARISMA<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is often the first Quality that people write about in their Self Reviews. It appears first on <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/o\/judge-testing\/level-3-advancement-process\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">the list<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> and is considered to be the most important. I\u2019m writing about it last because it is the most complex Quality due to its breadth. It\u2019s also the most difficult to nail down with objective measurements.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Here we have the ultimate in multi-quality prongs. Lumping Leadership, Presence, and Charisma together is like trying to watch all three <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lord of the Rings<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> movies in a row. Each one is already enough to fill you up; tackling all three at once is going to take some work.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">I\u2019ll begin by saying that <\/span><b>Charisma<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> is the most difficult of the three. Not only is it the most subjective, but also you are the least qualified to measure it in yourself. I recommend discussing Charisma with the people who surround you. Ask them to observe both you and others as they respond to you. For example, if you Head Judge a tournament and make announcements to the players, request feedback from other judges on your microphone charisma. If you lead a team meeting, ask one member in advance to pay attention to how you\u2019re received.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">To me,<\/span><b> Presence<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> is largely about what you do in the community. Do you participate meaningfully in <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/apps.magicjudges.org\/forum\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">JudgeApps discussions<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">? Do you write articles or record podcasts? These communications can be indicators for community presence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Of course, I don\u2019t mean that you should discount presence at events altogether. Other people might disagree, but to me, event \u201cpresence\u201d is more neatly bundled under the mantle of <\/span><b>Leadership<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. The biggest problem that I see when judges write about event leadership is that they fall back on recounting the number of times they\u2019ve led teams or head judged events. That\u2019s really just the first part of the equation. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">As I said in Tournament Operations and Logistics, you want to explain <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">how<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> you\u2019ve achieved success and <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">how <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">you\u2019ve displayed leadership. In fact, often online communications like blogging are a way of expanding your Leadership outside the event into an online Presence. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Snap Tip: <\/b><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Just breathe. If you get overwhelmed by the scope of this Quality, step away from writing for a day. Talk to people you trust about how you display these traits. Don\u2019t give up.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><b>SERIES WRAP-UP<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Writing a self review isn\u2019t easy. Writing the L3 Self Review has been cited as one of the most difficult things you can do as a judge. Some of the difficulty is by design: introspection, a necessary part of personal and professional growth, can be painful. But the Self Review can also look impossibly difficult because people envision it as one giant task. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Break this difficult task into manageable parts. Write about each Quality one at a time, and the process will look much more doable. In fact, you can further prepare for this challenge by regularly writing brief self reviews as updates after events. Choose one or two Quality per event to evaluate. Eventually, you\u2019ll have a substantial stockpile of documentation to draw on when you prepare to advance. <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Welcome back to the thrilling conclusion of the self evaluation series. If you\u2019re just joining me, be sure to go back to Parts One, Two, and Three. This week, as the second half of my advice on how to write your Level 3 Self Review, I\u2019ll be covering the final five Qualities of a Premier [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":275,"featured_media":268,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[6,49,25],"tags":[23,53,9,38],"language":[78],"class_list":["post-685","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-riki-hayashi","category-self-review","category-strategy","tag-edited-by-angela-aliff","tag-riki-hayashi","tag-self-review","tag-strategy","language-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/685","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/275"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=685"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/685\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":692,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/685\/revisions\/692"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=685"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=685"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=685"},{"taxonomy":"language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/language?post=685"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}