{"id":694,"date":"2018-05-15T20:32:03","date_gmt":"2018-05-15T20:32:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/?p=694"},"modified":"2018-05-15T20:32:03","modified_gmt":"2018-05-15T20:32:03","slug":"judgeapps-updates-april-2018","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/2018\/05\/15\/judgeapps-updates-april-2018\/","title":{"rendered":"JudgeApps Updates \u2013 April 2018"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Good morning JudgeApps!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Welcome back to a new edition of the JudgeApps blog. This month we have updates to reviews, exams and a small quality-of-life bug fix.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Also, while not directly related to a technical issue, we have retired the \u201cGrand Prix Solicitations and Selected Staffs\u201d forum. This forum is no longer needed, as JudgeApps already sends out notifications directly and the forum provides no additional benefits.<\/span><\/p>\n<h1><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Reviews<\/span><\/h1>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">There\u2019s a new review type for RCs and admins called Administrative Level Change. This was created to let relevant people edit judge levels if needed, in order to fix any errors that might have been introduced during an advancement review, or if a judge lapses erroneously. Most folks will never see a review of this type, but if you do, now you know what it means!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">We have also made it easier to share reviews. Now, when you share your reviews with another judge, the share will include a hyperlink. This link will connect to an already filtered list of reviews by the sharing judge, saving time and improving judges\u2019 ability to access information.<\/span><\/p>\n<h1><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Exams<\/span><\/h1>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">On the exams area of things, we have more updates this month.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">To start, we have made two changes to the way exams are getting generated. An info page was added to every exam, explaining to applicants what they are getting into, as well as a list of do\u2019s and don\u2019ts. On the more technical side, specifying a candidate for exams is now mandatory (even if it is generated for self evaluation). This change was implemented after many judges generated exams for themselves, even though they were intended for another person.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">For our exam takers, we have also changed the description of the comments section in exams to help reflect better what we hope to learn in that area, to avoid suggestions \u00a0that are beyond the scope of the content creators (such as requests for changes to policy).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">For candidates and judges who like to read cards in non-English languages, we are aware that with some of the new rules updates some card translations have become incorrect. To address this, a new system was set in place: whenever a card\u2019s text changes, its translated versions are marked as unavailable. For each language, a translator for that language has to review the card\u2019s text and correct it if needed, before marking the translation as available once more. To further help the people translating questions, we have added a new dashboard to the question editing page,to accurately show what components are still missing translation, or are under review.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">We have also added a few features for the people working behind the scenes, to help them help all of you. We added a search function for exam writers to improve their quality of life while sifting through questions, and \u00a0an option for the people viewing exam statistics to separate rules from policy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lastly, we have made two technical changes to exams. First, we have fixed a bug when clicking on the \u201cView All Exams\u201d link on a user\u2019s exam list. The last update we made caused a bug where clicking the link would return a \u201cPage unavailable\u201d error, which has been corrected (thanks <span class='judge-tooltip'><a href='https:\/\/apps.magicjudges.org\/judges\/dci\/725295' >Uncle Scott<\/a><span class='avatar'><img width='200' height='200' src='https:\/\/apps.magicjudges.org\/dci\/avatar?dci=725295&size=200'><\/span><\/span> for noticing). And second, we have made a technical change to the way we represent answer IDs in exam webpages, to prevent any tech savvy individuals from trying to get an advantage by viewing the exam source code.<\/span><\/p>\n<h1><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Quality of Life<\/span><\/h1>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Only a small update here. There seems to have been an issue with the avatar cropping tool that prevented it from working due to some compatibility issues with the system versions we use. This was fixed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you have any <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/apps.magicjudges.org\/feedback\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">feedback<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, please send it to us so we can make JudgeApps better. If you have any problems, suggestions, or just some thoughts to share, please let us know about it.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This month we made some improvements to reviews, added some tools for exam content creators and translators, and retired one of the forums. Want to find out more? Hop into the latest edition of the JudgeApps update blog (featuring Scott Marshall)!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":368,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"language":[11],"class_list":["post-694","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-updates","language-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/694","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/368"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=694"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/694\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":695,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/694\/revisions\/695"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=694"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=694"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=694"},{"taxonomy":"language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/judgeapps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/language?post=694"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}