{"id":1228,"date":"2015-01-21T10:52:28","date_gmt":"2015-01-21T18:52:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/?p=1228"},"modified":"2015-02-05T15:07:05","modified_gmt":"2015-02-05T23:07:05","slug":"schrodingers-markings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/2015\/01\/21\/schrodingers-markings\/","title":{"rendered":"Schr\u00f6dinger&#8217;s Markings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p><img  style='float:right'  class='lems-mtg-cardimg' src='http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Handlers\/Image.ashx?size=small&type=card&name=Bend or Break'><\/p>You are the Team Lead of the Deck Checks team at a Super Sunday Series event at a Grand Prix. You perform a random beginning-of-round deck check on Andy at the beginning of round 7. You notice that throughout the event, Andy&#8217;s main deck has become quite warped from the way that he is shuffling, and the sideboard has 15 flat cards in it. If you put a sideboard card into his deck, it is quite easy to see where it is from the side. What do you do?<\/p>\n<p>Judges, feel free to discuss this scenario <a href=\"http:\/\/apps.magicjudges.org\/forum\/topic\/15645\/\" target=\"_blank\">on Judge Apps<\/a>!<\/p>\n<p>[expand title=Answer]As in all other aspects of policy, we don&#8217;t particularly care how long Andy&#8217;s sideboard and main deck have looked like this. We don&#8217;t want to penalize players for actions they may or may not have taken in previous games. We also don&#8217;t want to start considering players to have committed infractions before they happen. We&#8217;re not Tom Cruise and none of us are in Minority Report.<\/p>\n<p>We need to look into whether or not there is currently an infraction and what the appropriate penalty would be. TE\u2013Marked Cards says \u201cA player\u2019s cards are marked or oriented in a way that could potentially give an advantage to that player.\u201d I think we can all agree that the sideboard cards could offer an advantage to that player if they are used. We also assume that when a player makes a sideboard, they will use it in some manner.<\/p>\n<p>The upgrade clause states \u201cThe Head Judge has the option to upgrade this penalty to a Game Loss if he or she believes that a player noticing the pattern of markings would clearly compromise the integrity of the game.\u201d We here at the Knowledge Pool don&#8217;t agree that this criteria has been met. Since this was a beginning of round deck check, we thankfully caught this problem before the integrity of the game has been damaged and there is no need to upgrade this.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, this falls under Tournament Error\u2013Marked Cards and comes with a Warning. Due to the nature of this problem, we have a few options available to us, and you should consult with the Head Judge exactly how they want to proceed. We have a couple options. We can instruct the player to replace their entire main deck. We can also instruct the player to warp their sideboard to match their main deck.<\/p>\n<p>This won&#8217;t be a simple fix. However, this player has created the situation through their own actions. This is really no different from a player who ignores our announcement, sets his open drink on the table, then drenches his deck and wants us to fix his problem. [\/expand]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You are the Team Lead of the Deck Checks team at a Super Sunday Series event at a Grand Prix. You perform a random beginning-of-round deck check on Andy at the beginning of round 7. You notice that throughout the event, Andy&#8217;s main deck has become quite warped from the way that he is shuffling, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"language":[56],"class_list":["post-1228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gold","language-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1228"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1233,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228\/revisions\/1233"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1228"},{"taxonomy":"language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/knowledgepool\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/language?post=1228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}