{"id":1316,"date":"2016-11-03T03:42:24","date_gmt":"2016-11-03T03:42:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/?p=1316"},"modified":"2016-11-03T04:07:17","modified_gmt":"2016-11-03T04:07:17","slug":"face2face-games-3k-modern-tournament-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/2016\/11\/03\/face2face-games-3k-modern-tournament-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Face2Face Games 3K &#8211; Modern\u00a0Tournament Report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div class=\"wp-caption alignleft judgeimg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/apps.magicjudges.org\/judges\/dci\/32770463\"><img src=https:\/\/apps.magicjudges.org\/dci\/avatar?dci=32770463&size=200 alt=\" Mark Randol, Level 1, Innisfail AB, Canada \"><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\"> Mark Randol, Level 1, Innisfail AB, Canada <\/p><\/div><br \/>\nOctober 15, 2016 | Calgary, AB Canada<br \/>\n162 Players<br \/>\n5 Judges<\/p>\n<p>I was a floor judge for this event.\u00a0 The event included side events as well as the main event.\u00a0 I wanted to report on a few interesting things that came up in the event.<\/p>\n<p>At the start of the event a player called me over to check his opponent&#8217;s sleeves.\u00a0 They were highly worn.\u00a0 It is unlikely that the player was cheating in any way but due to the wear of the sleeves it would have been possible so I had the player re-sleeve, issued a time extension to cover the time taken to do so and issued a tournament error marked cards warning to the player.<\/p>\n<p><strong>On Resolving Valakut Triggers<\/strong><br \/>\n<p><img  style='float:right'  class='lems-mtg-cardimg' src='http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Handlers\/Image.ashx?size=small&type=card&name=Valakut, The Molten Pinnacle'><\/p><br \/>\nThere was an interaction involving <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Scapeshift&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Scapeshift<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Valakut%2C+The+Molten+Pinnacle&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Valakut, The Molten Pinnacle<\/a> and land destruction.\u00a0 The active player cast <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Scapeshift&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Scapeshift<\/a>, leaving a single copy of <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Valakut%2C+The+Molten+Pinnacle&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Valakut, The Molten Pinnacle<\/a> as his only permanent.\u00a0 He fetched two more copies of <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Valakut%2C+The+Molten+Pinnacle&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Valakut, The Molten Pinnacle<\/a> and 6 mountains, one of which was a non-basic, off of <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Scapeshift&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Scapeshift<\/a>.\u00a0 With the damage triggers on the stack his opponent destroyed the non-basic mountain.\u00a0 The ruling was that the non-active player would take 9 damage because the triggers for the destroyed land would still resolve normally (there were still 5 *other* mountains in play) but the triggers for the other 5 mountains would not as to them there were only 4 *other* mountains still in play.<\/p>\n<p><p><img  style='float:left'  class='lems-mtg-cardimg' src='http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Handlers\/Image.ashx?size=small&type=card&name=Grafdigger%27s Cage'><\/p><br \/>\n<strong>Grafdigger&#8217;s Cage and Nahiri&#8217;s Ultimate<\/strong><br \/>\nI had to tell another play that though it was completely legal to ultimate his <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Nahiri%2C+The+Harbinger&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Nahiri, The Harbinger <\/a> with <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Grafdigger%26%238217%3Bs+Cage&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Grafdigger&#8217;s Cage<\/a> in play, he unfortunately could not put <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Emrakul%2C+the+Aeons+Torn&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Emrakul, the Aeons Torn<\/a> into play.\u00a0 I did not remind him that he could put an artifact into play if he had one as that would be outside assistance.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IPG Issues<\/strong><br \/>\nI had my first instance of implementing the new remedy for a self-called Mulligan Procedure Error.\u00a0 The player had drawn seven cards rather than six on the mulligan.\u00a0 The new procedure allows the player who self-called the choice of either taking another mulligan or allowing his opponent to choose a card for him to shuffle back into his library.\u00a0 He, of course, was not happy with either choice.\u00a0 I like the new remedy because there is at least a choice, even if neither choice is desirable.<\/p>\n<p>I had an incident where, when cutting the opponent&#8217;s deck, the player left a singular card on the table (dexterity error?) from the bottom of the deck.\u00a0 The player to whom the deck belonged noticed the card after placing his seven cards face down on the table.\u00a0 He&#8217;d not yet looked at them so I had them shuffle the deck again with the missing card, cut again, and re-draw.\u00a0 I did not issue any penalties on this.\u00a0 Had play actually started I would have issued warnings to both players.<\/p>\n<p>The final incident of note was a player fumbling his opponent&#8217;s deck while shuffling it.\u00a0 This revealed several cards from the deck as well as had some fall to the floor.\u00a0 The player, to whom the deck belonged had concerns that, because some cards had fallen to the floor, that it was possible that not all of the cards had been recovered.\u00a0 In order to ensure the integrity of the deck I had the player perform a stack shuffle\/count and then reshuffle the deck.\u00a0 I, of course, issued looking at extra cards warning to the player who had fumbled the deck.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Logisitcal Concerns<\/strong><br \/>\nThe TO, Face2Face Games, had only 1 payment card point of sale device.\u00a0 This made it very awkward for them to running their merchandise booth while we were simultaneously trying to take payment for registration.\u00a0 TOs and Head Judges need to be aware that if only one card reader is available then it would be best to arrange the venue in such a way that everything that requires payment is in the same area.\u00a0 Unfortunately for our event I could not figure out\u00a0a way to lay it out so that registration\/side event registration and the vendors could all be near enough for this not to be completely awkward.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Do you have a big Modern Tournament coming up? Read <span class='judge-tooltip'><a href='https:\/\/apps.magicjudges.org\/judges\/dci\/32770463' >Mark Randol&#8217;s<\/a><span class='avatar'><img width='200' height='200' src='https:\/\/apps.magicjudges.org\/dci\/avatar?dci=32770463&#038;size=200'><\/span><\/span> tournament report to hear about his rulings on some interesting judge calls in the Modern Format! His work features valuable insights on card interactions and IPG implementation in a competitive setting. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":296,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[122],"language":[],"class_list":["post-1316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-modern","tag-mark-randol"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1316","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/296"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1316"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1316\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1331,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1316\/revisions\/1331"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1316"},{"taxonomy":"language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/reports\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/language?post=1316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}