{"id":269,"date":"2015-10-09T07:04:00","date_gmt":"2015-10-09T04:04:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rules\/?page_id=269"},"modified":"2021-09-27T02:23:28","modified_gmt":"2021-09-26T23:23:28","slug":"mtr3-10","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rules\/mtr3-10\/","title":{"rendered":"MTR 3.10 Card Shuffling"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0px\">Decks must be randomized at the start of every game and whenever an instruction requires it. Randomization is defined as bringing the deck to a state where no player can have any information regarding the order or position of cards in any portion of the deck.<\/p>\n<div class=\"alert alert-info\" role=\"alert\"> <em>The phrase \u201corder or position\u201d is key. A deck that is \u201cmana-weaved\u201d is not random; even though the player may have no information about the location of a specific card, they have information about the cards\u2019 order (that is, land-spell-spell, land-spell-spell). Also key is that a player shouldn\u2019t know any information on where a card is, not even which half of the deck it is in.<\/em><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0px\">Pile shuffling alone is not sufficiently random and may not be performed other than once each at the beginning of a game to count the cards in the deck.<\/p>\n<div class=\"alert alert-info\" role=\"alert\"> <em>Pile shuffling is completely non-random, since individual cards can be tracked and since cards are shuffled into a deterministic order. A single pile shuffle can help players count their decks and loosen sticky cards, but more than that a pile shuffle does not contribute to randomization and will qualify as <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rules\/ipg3-3\/\">Slow Play.<\/a> Once the game has begun the need to count the deck during randomization is largely gone.\u00a0 As such, a single pile shuffle at the start of the game is permitted, but is not allowed at any other time.\u00a0 Please remember when applying the IPG that habits are hard to break, and a single caution may be appropriate the first time.<\/em><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0px\">Once the deck is randomized, it must be presented to an opponent. By this action, players state that their decks are legal and randomized. The opponent may then shuffle it additionally. Cards and sleeves must not be in danger of being damaged during this process.<\/p>\n<div class=\"alert alert-info\" role=\"alert\"> <em>The deck should be fully randomized when presented to the opponent, and the opponents\u2019 shuffles are not meant to make the deck \u201cmore random.\u201d The purpose of the second shuffle is to discourage deck-stacking and cheating.<\/em><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0px\">If the opponent does not believe the player made a reasonable effort to randomize their deck, the opponent must notify a judge.<\/p>\n<div class=\"alert alert-info\" role=\"alert\"> <i>This rule is here so that a player doesn&#8217;t have to feel bad about calling a judge for insufficient shuffling.\u00a0 It&#8217;s in the rules, you have to. You aren&#8217;t the bad guy accusing the player of cheating.\u00a0 You are just bringing up an issue and the judge can investigate the issue.<\/i><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0px\">Players may request to have a judge shuffle their cards rather than the opponent; this request will be honored only at a judge\u2019s discretion.<\/p>\n<div class=\"alert alert-info\" role=\"alert\"> <em>Judges should use their discretion on this.\u00a0 Shuffling takes a significant amount of time, during which the judge can\u2019t take other calls. As shuffling for players is not a service that can be offered for all players it should be reserved for exceptional circumstances. Requests for judges to shuffle are exceedingly rare and typically arise when a player perceives there opponent as ill, or a &#8216;rough shuffler&#8217;, or there are mobility issues.\u00a0 The first two can be handled with quick instructions to the players (e.g. &#8216;please be more gentle while shuffling&#8217;, or &#8216;you may have an extension to wash your hands if needed&#8217;). Note: If a player is visibly showing signs of illness to the point that it is causing player distress, notify the Tournament Organizer. With respect to mobility issues, players with those issues typically inform the judges in advance, and accommodations\u00a0have already been made. If a mobility issue arises during the tournament, that is typically considered exceptional.<\/em><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0px\">If a player has had the opportunity to see any of the card faces of the deck being shuffled, the deck is no longer considered randomized and must be randomized again.<\/p>\n<div class=\"alert alert-info\" role=\"alert\"> <em>This rule is to codify a point where the shuffle has been undone.\u00a0 If you shuffle and then maybe see the bottom card while putting the deck down, we have to start over.\u00a0<\/em><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0px\">At Competitive and Professional Rules Enforcement Level tournaments, players are required to shuffle their opponents\u2019 decks after their owners have shuffled them. The Head Judge can require this at Regular Rules Enforcement Level tournaments as well.<\/p>\n<div class=\"alert alert-info\" role=\"alert\"> <em>In some cultures, asking to shuffle an opponent\u2019s deck would be considered an insult. The requirement to shuffle an opponent\u2019s deck is intended to prevent cheaters from taking advantage of these cultural norms.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Because a deck presented to an opponent should be random, this additional shuffle does not need to be thorough. However, simply cutting the deck is often not sufficient to meet this requirement.<\/em><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Decks must be randomized at the start of every game and whenever an instruction requires it. Randomization is defined as bringing the deck to a state where no player can have any information regarding the order or position of cards in any portion of the deck. Pile shuffling alone is not sufficiently random and may [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page_width-index.php","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"language":[6],"class_list":["post-269","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","language-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rules\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/269","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rules\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rules\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rules\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rules\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=269"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rules\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/269\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10040,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rules\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/269\/revisions\/10040"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rules\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=269"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rules\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/language?post=269"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}