{"id":3142,"date":"2013-03-26T07:00:50","date_gmt":"2013-03-26T12:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/?p=3142"},"modified":"2015-02-05T16:01:38","modified_gmt":"2015-02-06T00:01:38","slug":"understanding-out-of-order-sequencing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/2013\/03\/understanding-out-of-order-sequencing\/","title":{"rendered":"Understanding Out-of-Order Sequencing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Magic is a complex game. With over 12,000 unique cards and a hefty set of Comprehensive Rules, it\u2019s not reasonable to expect players to have complete mastery over the precise rules behind every action they\u2019re taking in the game.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, tournament Magic has codified a policy known as Out-of-Order Sequencing (OoOS for short). In a nutshell, OoOS permits players to perform actions without adhering to the strictest sense of the rules, as long as the sequence is still clear and arrives at a legal game state (along with a few other caveats).<br \/>\nThis rule serves to reinforce the way that Magic is usually played at kitchen tables and gaming stores everywhere anyway.<\/p>\n<p>To provide an example, suppose I control an <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Arbor+Elf&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Arbor Elf<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Thragtusk&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Thragtusk<\/a>. My opponent, feeling menaced by Mr. Tusk, decides to <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Supreme+Verdict&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Supreme Verdict<\/a> the board &#8212; so I put Thragtusk in the graveyard, put a Beast token onto the battlefield, and then put my Elf in the bin as well.<\/p>\n<p>Can you see the out-of-order sequencing? Looking closely, the Elf and Thragtusk should both go to the graveyard before I get to make a Beast &#8212; but it\u2019s very clear to everyone what\u2019s going on. So even though my actions were technically incorrect, they\u2019re still legal due to the protection of OoOS.<\/p>\n<p>In order for OoOS to be valid, a few criteria have to be met:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 16px\">The actions actually have to be a batch or block of actions, which means there\u2019s no substantial pause between the individual actions in the batch.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 16px\">An out-of-order sequence can\u2019t result in any player prematurely gaining information that would reasonably affect decisions later in that sequence. So u<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 16px\">sing OoOS as a way to \u201cgame\u201d an opponent\u2019s reactions isn&#8217;t permitted.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 16px\">OoOS doesn&#8217;t let you retroactively take an action you missed or forgot to do at the appropriate time. In other words, it\u2019s not a \u201cget out of jail free\u201d card.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 16px\">An opponent can request that I perform the out-of-order actions in the correct order, so that he\/she can respond at the appropriate point.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Because OoOS is a tournament rule, it applies at all tournaments, from FNM to the Pro Tour.<\/p>\n<p>A recent example of OoOS I observed at my local LGS involved Adam, who controlled a <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Syndic+of+Tithes&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Syndic of Tithes<\/a> and an unevolved <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Crocanura&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Crocanura<\/a>. Adam cast <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Ivy+Lane+Denizen&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Ivy Lane Denizen<\/a>. His opponent immediately said, \u201cThat resolves.\u201d In one motion, Adam put a counter on his Crocanura and tapped a Plains, saying, \u201cEvolve, extort.\u201d Technically speaking, because extort triggers on casting a creature spell, extort must always resolve before an evolve trigger does. However, in this case, Adam demonstrated that he was aware of both triggers and simply performed them in an incorrect order. The rules for OoOS tell us that this can be okay!<\/p>\n<p>Another example comes from the first day of Grand Prix Atlantic City in January 2013, an event run at Competitive rules enforcement. A player had <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-content\/plugins\/lems-mtg-helper\/lems-mtg-helper-cardfinder.php?find=Staff+of+Nin&width=223&height=310\" class=\"jTip\" name=\"\">Staff of Nin<\/a> and said, \u201cDraw for turn, draw for Staff of Nin.\u201d Again, this isn&#8217;t the correct order of things &#8212; Staff of Nin triggers in the upkeep step, which is immediately before the draw step. But it was ultimately ruled that out-of-order sequencing applied and the player had not missed her Staff of Nin trigger.<\/p>\n<p>In summary: out-of-order sequencing means it&#8217;s okay if you take actions in a technically incorrect order as long as it&#8217;s clear what you&#8217;re doing and you arrive at a legal game state that&#8217;s clear to both players. Even though the rule is somewhat complicated, it helps the flow of play go a lot more smoothly, which is why it exists!<\/p>\n<p>Today&#8217;s Tournament Tip written by Paul Baranay<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Magic is a complex game. With over 12,000 unique cards and a hefty set of Comprehensive Rules, it\u2019s not reasonable to expect players to have complete mastery over the precise rules behind every action they\u2019re taking in the game. As a result, tournament Magic has codified a policy known as Out-of-Order Sequencing (OoOS for short). [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1072,234,13],"tags":[],"language":[1196],"class_list":["post-3142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-missed-triggers","category-shortcuts","category-tournamentrules","language-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3142"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3142\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3972,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3142\/revisions\/3972"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3142"},{"taxonomy":"language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/rulestips\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/language?post=3142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}