Anafenza, the Foremost<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAfter AP passes the turn, his opponent said: \u201cYou\u2019re at 14\u201d. While NAP untaps, AP scratches the 13 he registered on his life pad and writes 14 instead.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The Investigation<\/em><\/p>\n
<\/p>When you confront this sequence of plays to the player\u2019s mana base, you can only conclude he had to be at 13. No cards made him gain life (including his opponent’s) and he lost a total of 7 life, in order:<\/p>\n
\n- 1 damage from Caves of Koilos to cast Thoughtseize<\/li>\n
- 2 life loss from Thoughtseize<\/li>\n
- 2 damages from both Caves of Koilos to cast Bile Blight<\/li>\n
- 2 damages from both Caves of Koilos to cast Anafenza<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
When confronted as to why he modified the correct 13 to an incorrect 14, the player could not come up with a good reason for scratching his own life totals. He tried to argue he thought he had made a mistake when tracking life and he believed his opponent was correct but a few facts made me doubt it:<\/p>\n
\n- First, he immediately scratched the 13 into a 14, which means that he didn\u2019t even question his opponent\u2019s assessment. When two players disagree on something, they usually try to assess who\u2019s right.<\/li>\n
- Then, the sequence of plays in the first two turns, and most notable the fact he took two damage to cast Bile Blight clearly shows he had to be aware two of his lands are painlands, thus he needed to take 2 for casting Anafenza.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The conclusion<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
These two elements made his argument oscillate between very weak and non-existent.<\/p>\n
As a reminder, Cheating requires three distinct elements to be identified:<\/p>\n
\n- Player committed the infraction intentionally<\/li>\n
- Player knew he was breaking a rule<\/li>\n
- Player aimed at gaining an advantage<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
The sequence of plays clearly proves that the player committed the infraction on purpose. The instant scratch makes me believe he seized the opportunity to discretely gain 1 life while being totally aware of what he was doing, certainly aiming at gaining an advantage. As for the knowledge he was breaking a rule, I have no doubts he was aware he needs to track life correctly.<\/p>\n
He was logically disqualified for USC \u2013 Cheating.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Cheating with opponent\u2019s life totals<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
This is another situation from GP Prague:<\/p>\n
Round 8, both players at 5\/2, game 3, first additional turn<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
AP is at 24 (on both players\u2019 life pads as well), plays Dismal Backwater and incorrectly says: 22, actually writing 22. NAP hesitates a bit, scratches the 25 he had written and puts 22.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The Investigation<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
The discussion went like this:
\n
<\/p><\/p>\n
\n- Me: Did you know he should be at 25 and not 22?<\/li>\n
- Player: Yes.<\/li>\n
- And you didn\u2019t call attention to it?<\/li>\n
- Nope<\/li>\n
- Any good reason why?<\/li>\n
- You know, it\u2019s his turn, extra turn 1, you can check my board, I have no cards in hand and even if I Demonic Tutor twice in my deck, I cannot win. I can\u2019t even not lose this game<\/li>\n
- I\u2019m confused here. If that was true, why didn\u2019t you concede this game earlier?<\/li>\n
- Honestly, I\u2019ve no clue. But it\u2019s so hot in here I certainly should have so at least I could breathe outside.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
I went to his table, grabbed his deck and noticed it was a Blue-Black Control deck that indeed could never win the game by Demonic tutoring twice (and likely not even three or four times in a row).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The conclusion<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
As per the three rules of Cheating, The player certainly met two: He broke a rule on purpose and knowing he couldn\u2019t do it.<\/p>\n
However, I could not identify criteria #3: The player wasn\u2019t trying to gain an advantage because there is no single way he can win this game. He was just careless because he was to a point he genuinely didn’t care anymore without malicious intent. And careless people aren\u2019t cheaters.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Some generalities<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Both situation started in the same way: An opponent announces a life change that is incorrect.<\/p>\n
The player had previously written the correct amount of life then scratches it to tracks what his opponent erroneously said, each time to his own advantage, either by making the opponent lose life or by gaining life.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
These situations are extremely concerning<\/strong> and MUST<\/strong> be investigated. Not may be or should be, but MUST<\/strong>. Modifying life totals is a very easy way to cheat, but even without Cheating involved, you prefer to detect the issue when it happens than during that game-decisive combat phase.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
These situations are very hard to detect. Twice, it was caught because a judge was watching the game<\/a><\/strong> and decided to chime in immediately to assess what is the correct life totals. I was the first judge and Jurgen Baert was the other. Huge props for noticing and involving me right away.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Detecting and processing these situations<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\n- If you see a player scratching life totals, intervene and double check what is happening.<\/li>\n
- Assess the correct life totals.<\/li>\n
- Quickly evaluate who benefits from the mistake: The scratching player or the other?<\/li>\n
- If it is the scratching player, ask another judge to stay at the table and involve the Head Judge right away.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Kevin Desprez<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Life totals discrepancies happen many times. With Fetchlands, Shocklands and Painlands being heavily played and the fact players are often more focused on the card they cast than on the lands they tap for mana, the odds players end up tracking their life totals incorrectly are high. This means that the potential for this […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":77,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"language":[14],"class_list":["post-738","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-investigations","language-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/whatsupdocs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/738","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/whatsupdocs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/whatsupdocs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/whatsupdocs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/77"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/whatsupdocs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=738"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/whatsupdocs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/738\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":773,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/whatsupdocs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/738\/revisions\/773"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/whatsupdocs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=738"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/whatsupdocs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=738"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/whatsupdocs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=738"},{"taxonomy":"language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.magicjudges.org\/whatsupdocs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/language?post=738"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}