Skip to content

What's Up, Docs?

Expanding on the philosophy behind the MIPG, MTR and Tournament Practices

Header Image
  • Home
  • Tournament Reports
  • Tournament procedures
  • Game Play Errors

Category: Investigations

Investigations

Investigations : le rôle de l’arbitre de salle

09/01/201517/11/2016 | cixidetroy

Il serait aisé de croire qu’enquêter est exclusivement réservé au Head Judge. Ce n’est pas une façon peu commune de penser, ce n’est pas non plus déraisonnable. Toutefois, une telle croyance peut être au détriment de la qualité d’une investigation. Disons le franchement : sans arbitre de salle, il n’y aurait aucune enquête.  

Read more.

Investigations

Investigating: The Role of the Floor Judge

09/01/201508/11/2016 | KevinD

It would be easy to believe that investigating is the exclusive prerogative of the Head Judge. That’s not an uncommon way of thinking. It’s not unreasonable either. However, such a belief can be detrimental to the quality of an investigation.   Let’s state it bluntly: Without Floor Judges, there would be no Investigations.  

Read more.

Posts navigation

Newer posts

Categories

  • General (21)
  • Investigations (10)
  • MIPG (11)
    • GPE (6)
    • TE (3)
    • USC (2)
  • MTR (10)
  • Tournament procedures (29)
  • Tournament Reports (25)
  • [O]fficial (11)
    • Official card rulings (6)
    • Official Tournament Procedures (4)

Stay Connected

  • RSS

Categories

  • General (21)
  • Investigations (10)
  • MIPG (11)
    • GPE (6)
    • TE (3)
    • USC (2)
  • MTR (10)
  • Tournament procedures (29)
  • Tournament Reports (25)
  • [O]fficial (11)
    • Official card rulings (6)
    • Official Tournament Procedures (4)

Stay Connected

  • RSS

Need help with your own blog? Contact us!