Rulings of note A double HCE The situation NAP activates and tape three other artifacts. He announces “for four” while he takes the top 4 cards, from which he quickly selects one that’s added to his hand. Meanwhile, AP takes the Merchant’s Dockhand to read it. When he intervenes to point out the mistake, the selected card has already been added to NAP’s hand. The Investigation Considering the mistake
Category: Tournament Reports
Team Sealed GPs specifics (Also a GP Kyoto HJ Report)
Rulings-wise, Kyoto has not been the most exciting Grand Prix I’ve ever been. Actually, not a single ruling is worth mentioning here. However, it featured some unique challenges, which are worth exploring. Team Sealed: A generally long event A Team Sealed Event can be fairly long. Indeed, many steps vastly differ from its individual counterpart Boosters Presentation This competitive-REL procedure usually takes about 2-3 minutes
PT Sydney HJ Report
Draft Specific considerations A lost card A player calls us at the beginning of the deck construction period to claim he is missing a card. This card is his First Pick First Pack. He is able to tell which card it is but is unable to locate it. Following the guidelines described in this article, we did not issue any proxy. Being unable to recover the lost card before the end of deck construction, he registered a 40-card deck without that card. He found it back later
GP Pittsburgh Support Judge report
Tournament Best practices Efficiently redoing a decklist If you end up in a situation where a player’s decklist is missing, here is the best course of action: Deck Check the player at the beginning of a round When the deck is fully sorted, take one (or more) picture(s) of it. Give the decks back. Ask the player to make sure the content of his sideboard is correct. Write the decklist, making it clear it was rewritten by a judge, and put your name